LITTLE_SCROLL//03_Part_One

The Contents of the Prophesied Book:
"THE LITTLE SCROLL"

Following are the contents of a seven part book presenting the worlds first models for a complete quantum mechanical and molecular biological theoretical paradigm of unification. This is claimed as:

"The Ultimate Theory of Everything"

Although the Subject of the Book takes References in Religious Prophesies, it is not Religion Oriented.
The Interest in--and the Connection to--the Religious Prophesies, is Purely on the basis of Physics and Neurological Theoretical Considerations regarding Man's Perception of the Phenomena of Time. This is explained throughout the Book in it's following 7 Parts:

00 : Introductions	The Presentation of the Book.
01 : The Preface	The Introduction of the Book's Foundat- ions.
02 : The Premises	The Spiritual Justification for the Book.
03 : Part One 1	Introduction to the Cutting Edge of Theo- retical Physics and its Approach to the Theory of Everything.
*04 : Part One 2*	Introduction to the Venn-set Theoretical Approach to the Theory of Everything.
*05 : Part Two 1*	The Venn-set Theoretical Models for the Process during the Creation of Time and the Quantum Wave of the Universe.
*06 : Part Two 2*	The Venn-set Theoretical Models for the Creation of Mass during the First Second of Time.
*07 : Part Three 1*	The Initial Connection of the Venn-set QF-Theory of Everything, to the Standard Model of Physics.
08 : Part Three 2	The Initial Connection of the Venn-set QF-Theory of Everything to Life, the Human Brain and Consciousness.
09 : Epilogue	The Initial Philosophical Conclusions and Bibliography.

To Home-Index-Front-Page

"There are two revelations in reality; the first is given to us in scripture and tradition, and it guided our thinking for centuries. The second revelation is given by the Universe, and that book we are just beginning to read."

"And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the throne a book written within and on the back side, sealed with seven seals. And I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, Who is worthy to open the book, and to loose the seals thereof? And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon. And I wept much, because no man was found worthy to open and to read the book, neither to look thereon. And one of the elders saith unto me, Weep not: behold, the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof. And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne and of the four beasts, and in the midst of the elders, stood a lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent forth into the earth. And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne."

"It is impossible to contemplate the spectacle of the starry universe without wondering how it was formed: perhaps we ought to wait to look for an answer to this question until we have patiently assembled the elements,... but if we were so reasonable, if we were curious without impatience, it is probable we would never have created Science and that we would always have been content with a trivial existence. Thus the mind has imperiously laid claim to the answer to this question long before it was ripe, even while perceived in only faint glimmers allowing us to guess an answer rather than wait for it."

Henri Poincaré’s philosophical sentimental contemplation from 1913, quoted above, may by now, have become a must for humanity and it is something, which has to do with the subject of this book. These hunting questions have been with us for as long as Man has had memories of his existence in extra-genetic bits of knowledge in the written form. What is the nature of reality? What is truth? Even the question: “Why are we asking these questions?” has been popping up at regular intervals throughout our recorded history. The time may have come that Man must find the answers to them or face extinction. Indeed, when it comes to the questions, one fool can ask questions that ten sages can’t answer.

At the beginning of our recorded history we find the question and answer game being undertaken primarily by religious sages and prophets and later by individuals which were called nature, or religious philosophers, with the original meaning of the Greek word denoting something like: “Lover of knowledge and wisdom.”

During the latter part of the Middle Ages, particularly after the beginning of the Renaissance, and during the last four centuries of the Enlightenment, many of the engagements of the philosophers evolved into what we today know as the different disciplines of the sciences. The past two centuries have in particular seen these evolve into numerous highly specialized branches of inquiry. In continuation of this, the 20th century then saw specialization reaching what many regard as extreme, with some of the lesser philosophical and theological speculations of the ancient thinkers turning into hard core scientific investigations. However, during the latter half of this century, the oddity in this trend has been the tendency of some of the more sophisticated disciplines to approach each other and eventually to reunite. This is not taking place due to some ideology of the scientists, but due to the nature of the subjects of investigation. In this the scientists have become aware that they are in fact trying to solve the same questions, by different routes. This reunification process has primarily been lead by the convergence of theoretical physics, cosmology, astrophysics and high-energy particle physics. Today, it may be said that it is centered on what is now known as the Standard Inflationary Model of the Big Bang and the Standard Model of Elementary Particles. These two models have become so interdependent, that one can speak of just one model, ‘The Standard Model’. Although some, for several reasons, have demanded the inclusion of the Observer into The Standard Model, this has proven too complex.

It is this theoretical model of the Universe, ‘The Standard Model’, and the inclusion of Man, which is the subject of these writings. As regards the proceedings of the sciences, the prime excitement regarding The Standard Model is the question whether this will, through its further evolution, provide the ultimate answers about everything. The theorization dealing with the first part of the Universe’s First Second of Creation suggest a moment where all the forces of nature are united into one. As explained in the beginning of this book this is known as complete unification theory, or CUT for short. A fraction of a second later, gravity separates from the other forces and the unification that then prevails for another fraction of a second, is described by physicists in grand unification theories, or GUTs for short. With the achievement of a Complete Unified Theory that includes Life and the Observer’s consciousness, the QF-theory becomes a final Theory of Everything, or TOE for short.

One may ask: How is it possible that the answers to everything are to be found in an event that lies some 15.000.000.000 years (±3.000.000.000) back in time? How can this event be the focal point of Man’s search for the ultimate understanding of himself and his place in the Universe? This certainly seems a far-fetched idea. If this is really the case, then surely this must be the greatest detective story in history. This suggests that the physicists solving these riddles must be history’s greatest heroes and we indeed, living in exciting times, to witness the unfolding of these enigmas.

The questions of the creation of the Universe are not new, as the Biblical book of Genesis and numerous mythological writings verify. What is new, starting some 73 years ago, is the transfiguration of the age-old enigmas into the current mathematical and experimental science engagements dealing with these questions. How did the spiritual, theological creation speculations of the philosophers develop into modern creation science? Speculations for such science may have taken place as far back as John Michell (1724-1793), but they have their formal beginning in the work of a Belgian priest. It was around 1927 that father Georges Lemaitre first publicly presented his ideas for the creation process of the Universe’s in the terms of modern physics. His ideas were worked out of Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity, and in them, the Universe was evolved from an explosion of a “primeval atom”. Later, the famed British physicist, Sir Fred Hoyle, would dub this “The Big Bang”. Another George would be the next in line to grapple with this puzzle. It was the Russian born American physicist, George Gamow, who in 1948 created the first physics models of the First Second of Creation.

The Big Bang, or whatever we choose to call it, comprises the moment of the beginning of our creation. This did not take place, when our parents got together to contribute a half each of a genome, but some 5 x 10¹⁷ seconds ago. The First Second of Creation is not only the time of the creation of the fundamental constituents of matter, but also the initiation of the process for the creation of our bodies, brains and consciousness which we are made of. The reading of this book should show the reader that the laws for our creation are indeed written at that “time”. In the next chapter, we shall be looking closer at the story of the quantum mechanical science of creation in the 20th century, but here we shall be looking at the prime questions and enigmas involved.

In the past two decades a flood of books on the subject of the search for the first and foremost fundamental truths of Nature, has become available to the public where this difficult subject is being explained by many a brilliant scientist and science writer. As this is written, some of our physicists are telling us that they are situated on a crossroad on their way to the final answer. This is not only the problem with the higher energies of the accelerators, but problems which are further confounded by the difficult decision on which road to take. This has to do with selection and creation of conceptual approaches in the face of encroaching limitations of the mathematical and technical methods. In whatever form the ultimate findings may be, they are now being described as the Theory of Everything. Consequently, these writings begin with a brief overview of the prime targets in the search of humanity for the Theory of Everything, what this search is all about as it concerns physics and humanity at large. Following are some points, taken from some of the leading physicists, regarding the challenges involved in the final understanding of the Universe.

We begin by quoting Kitty Ferguson in her enlightening 1991 book STEPHEN HAWKING, QUEST FOR A THEORY OF EVERYTHING where she asks: “What would a theory to explain the universe be like?” Kitty calls the prime questions: “Challenges for Theory of Everything candidates!” Here they are:*

02) “It must answer the question, What are the ‘boundary conditions’ of the universe, the conditions at the very
instant of beginning, before any time whatsoever passed?”

03) “It must allow few options. It ought to be ‘restrictive.’ It should, for instance, predict precisely how many types
of particles there are. If it leaves opinions, it must somehow account for the fact that we have the universe we
have and not a slightly different one.”

04) “It should contain few arbitrary elements. Paradoxically, the Theory of Everything itself may be an arbitrary
element.”

05) “It must predict a universe like the universe we observe or else explain convincingly why there’s a
discrepancy... A Theory of Everything must find a way to survive comparison with what we observe.”

06) “It should be simple, although it must allow for enormous complexity.”

07) “It must solve the enigma of combining Einstein’s theory of general relativity with quantum mechanics...
Both general relativity and quantum mechanics are exceptionally good theories,... Nevertheless, put together
they yield infinities and nonsense. The Theory of Everything must somehow resolve that nonsense.”

Ferguson reminds us of Hawking’s question: “Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?”* which is in fact a part of the question that started the author’s adventure into this field. Ferguson further reminds her readers that: “The Theory of Everything will be a set of laws that make it possible to predict events up to the limit set by the uncertainty principle, and that means in many cases we will have to satisfy ourselves with statistical probabilities, not specifics.”*

As a continuation of this she further reports that: “Stephen Hawking sums up our problem. In answer to the question whether everything is predetermined, either by the Theory of Everything, or by God, he says, Yes he thinks it is. ‘But it might as well not be, because we can never know what is determined.’”* However, that is something the author dares challenge in this book. It may even be stated that the central theme of this book is to show how its creation is predetermined.

In a most excellent book, Dr. F. David Peat discusses extensively the main problems facing the late twentieth century emerging superstring theories (pages 51-53) and sums these up by the suggestion that some sort of a “superstring field concepts” are needed as a final theory. From Dr. F. David Peat’s book SUPERSTRINGS AND THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING are noted the following questions:

01) What are the elementary particles?
02) What is mass?
03) Why are there four forces in nature?
04) What are the symmetries of the elementary particles?
05) Why is our space three-dimensional?
06) Why is the cosmological constant zero?
07) What is the relationship between relativity and quantum theory?

With the 1979-1984 achievement of the electro-weak unification; the birth of the theoretical models of the superstrings, the employment of what is known as super-symmetry equations from yesterday’s mathematical symmetry transformations known as group theory, the leading scientists of our times are declaring that the ultimate goal of all of Man’s endeavor at understanding the Universe, is within reach. In a recent publication on the subject by the brilliant physicist Steven Weinberg, we find the following questions crowding the professor’s mind: “What do we mean by one scientific principle ‘explaining’ another? How do we know that there is a common starting point for all such explanations? Will we ever discover that point? How close are we now? What will the final theory be like? What part of our present physics will survive in a final theory? What will it say about life and consciousness? What will happen to the human spirit when we have our final theory?” In an End of the Millennium Special Issue of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, published in December 1999, in an article titled “A Unification of Physics by 2050?” Professor Weinberg makes a most interesting summary of the situation in theoretical physics at the end of the century. This includes a graph showing the situation, which is copied here with the kind permission of SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN.

In a brilliant ‘92 book, DREAMS OF A FINAL THEORY, Weinberg makes these prognostics: “We may find ourselves led mathematically to a part or all of the final theory, as the only way of avoiding infinities. Indeed, the esoteric new theory of strings may already have provided the unique way of avoiding infinities when we reconcile relativity with quantum mechanics. If so, it will be a large part of any final theory. I do not mean to suggest that the final theory will be deduced from pure mathematics... A final theory will be final in only one sense–it will bring to an end a certain sort of science, the ancient search for those principles that cannot be explained in terms of deeper principles.”* Weinberg’s End of the Millennium Special Issue article also presents us with an excellent graphical diagram showing the situation of the main theoretical aspects of the history of this progression and how they relate to the search for the final truth.

The Overview History of Theoretical Physics
at the End of the Twentieth Century.

Figure 008

Professor Weinberg expresses hopes for a unified physics by the year 2050, but he also suggests that it is impossible to say when the problems of physics will be overcome. It may as well be by 2150. He however, concedes that such unification “will probably require radically new ideas.”* This remark is much in line with a suggestion made by Karl Popper, which appears at the entry to chapter seven of this part. Here are his remarks: “I am inclined to think that scientific discovery is impossible without faith in ideas which are of a purely speculative kind and sometimes quite hazy; a faith which is quite unwarranted from a scientific point of view.”* The author is also inclined to agree with these analyzes on the basis that if it was not so–considering the multitude of brilliant thinkers working on this–physics would in all probability have come up with the answer long ago.

At the core of the QF-theory, on the subject of a Complete Unified Theory and a Theory of Everything, lies the idea of a program for the quanta that represents the “Wave-function of the Universe”. This, according to the Standard Model of the Big Bang, is created at a specific fraction of the First Second of Creation that lies some 15.000.000.000 years (±3.000.000.000) in the past. A time during which the conditions of the Universe are known by the physicists to have been extremely simple, relative to the complexities of the Universe as we find it today. A time, during which, truth is dressed in the garb of simplicity.

This specific time is a part of the First Second of Creation that is known as the GUT ERA (Grand Unification Era) and it is the simplicity of that moment that is sought to be captured. It is during this time, that the nature of what is taking place can only be described in the terms of quantum mechanics. It is here that the birth of time is completed. This is the moment of the “first quantum-wave of the Universe”. At this second fraction, the program for all consequent wave functions was written, and this in turn includes the present wave function of the consciousness of the human brain. It may thus represent the very program for the ultimate reality of the Universe, as it is perceivable by the human brain. Eventually, this may include the answers to all questions about life, and the value of this alone may turn out to be immeasurable, particularly if it contributes to the destruction of some of Man’s long standing arguments regarding reality. In particular such seemingly endless differences as the oldest and bloodiest argument of Man; The argument about God. A concept that according to the religions is one that should be uniting Men, not drive them asunder. The reference is primarily in regard to religious, ethnic, economic and political differences, as well as the possibility of it bringing solutions to the numerous functional malfunction disorders of the human brain.

The current state of affairs in Man’s effort at solving the final questions in physics is beginning to indicate problems with the methods used to understand nature. This is brought on by the fact that the magic of mathematics seems to be insufficient in dealing with the final understanding of gravity. Another problem makes the subject further of extraordinary nature, but this is the fact that according to the methods and requirements of physics, the QF-theory may forever remain, just theorizations, since the nature of the subject is such that no direct experimental proof may ever be attainable. The energies required would be far to high for any direct experimentation. This is to many physicists a dreaded nightmare, since it may ultimately leave them with nothing to turn to but philosophy in the form of the Anthropic Principle. This refers to a statement that says everything is as it is because we are as we are. – This book deals with the problems that have been described here briefly, approaching them with an alternative approach, an alternative mathematical method. This is known as set-mathematics and the particular method used has been dubbed: The QREST-FIELD, or QF-approach. However, the QF-theory is not mere speculations since it attempts to follow as closely as possible–and is for the most part in agreement with–the existing theories of the worlds leading physicists.

In the accelerator experiments Nature is not know to lie or delude Man, but something in the function of Man’s brain is known to produce delusions. The mathematical method prevents the delusions for the most part. When it comes to interpretations of Nature, Man’s creative/imaginative powers are know to have run amok with his mind. It is for this reason that the author has required a constant check with physics in order to prevent the running wild of his imagination. To give the reader an insight into the scope of the accelerators, the author has–with the kind permission of Dr. F. D. Peat–in part borrowed and updated the following graph from his superb book, SUPERSTRINGS. This graph gives an idea of the energies involved in the studying of the microcosms and the ultimate unification of forces. It also shows the achievements and current status of Man’s accelerators and for the beginning of the 21st century proposed plans by CERN (LHC = Large Hadron Collider) and by Fermilab (VLHC = Very Large Hadron Collider).

Close comparison to the theories and experimental findings of physics have thus served to keep the author’s creative thinking in check. Here a special danger is involved in the symbolic logic of the QREST-FIELD approach, since these deal in extreme simplicity and provide a form of visual images of thinking, something which mathematical processes and equations cannot do. The QF-system is thus a form of pictorial mathematics, which achieves such simplicity that it may be dubbed “mathemagics”. This should, however, not be understood to mean that the method can provide a true picture of the quantum particles. These are as elusive as ever. The system is purely a symbolic language of logic, which does not deal in magnitudes and quantities, while dealing with the nature of Nature, in the arena of quantum logic and quantum phenomena. In this the author believes that he has succeeded in linking successfully the two fields of science which have presented the greatest unification difficulties: The linking of the Standard Model of Physics to Biology and Human Consciousness.

As is indicated in the Premises section at the beginning of this book, the author engaged in this subject in order to save his life. In this sense the QF-theory has proven itself valid to the extent that it has satisfied the personal needs of the writer in as much as they have brought the results sought. This through the fact that the ideas evolved out of the theorizations of the “Wave-function of the Universe”and “Wave-function of Conscious- ness,” have served to save and sustain the life of the person writing them. This may be the first such case in history. The suggestion is that the Observer connection of the QF-theory is a possible indication of its validity. There are other possible verifications, such as explanations for numerous unexplained phenomena. The diversity of explanations has a wide range, from such odd feature as the directions of particle spin, to models for holistic arrangement of the human brain and the reasons for the left-handed spin-structure in the amino acids of life. However, before we get into the thick of the action, we should be looking at a few more questions regarding the more difficult parts of this undertaking. These are questions pertaining to the entity asking the question; The QF-theory. – We may also have to ask the question: Why are we–humanity– asking all these questions?

The possibility for answers to the age-old riddles about life itself is perhaps the most interesting part of the prospects involving a Theory of Everything. Is there such a thing as an independent Life Force, or is life simply a blind mechanical electro-chemical reaction. Whatever the answer may be, they are sure to be found at the level of the atom, the quantum level. That level is the reality of life since the reality of the DNA is at least partially quantum reality. Currently quantum reality is by many physicists described as the Reality Marketplace.

The central location for the enigma of life is thus situated in the very structure and function of the DNA. Here are some profound/fundamental questions and riddles still unanswered regarding the life-functions:

01) What mechanism governs the homeotic genes’ selection of the appropriate part of the DNA in the RNA coding for proteins and cells morphogenic abilities. This is the cell’s specialization and integration riddle.

02) Why are there two kinds of nucleotides, exons and introns, in the DNA of eukaryotes (Multi-cell organism). In prokaryotes (Single-cell organism) mostly only one type, exons?

03) What governs the exon selection work of the spliceosome molecule on the hnRNA and what is the mechanism that governs the protein structuring? Is it really all only a mindless electro-chemical reaction?

05) Why are there less than 2,75% of the nucleotides that form the genes (exons and introns) in the DNA of eukaryotes? Is it possible that the 97,25% are just redundant genes? Is it really possible that these represent only that nature failed to whip out in the evolution?

06) Why does the DNA fail–mostly without an apparent reason–causing cancer and the many other statistical sicknesses, such as the MND (MS and ALS).

These are possibly the prime questions of many regarding the DNA. We could go on with a long list of questions regarding the functions and the failures of the DNA. The real questions and answers regarding life are bound to be a bit bigger than some questions regarding some form of mechanism. They will have to explain what ever it is that makes “dead atoms” start to take on energy in order to align themselves with other atoms forming purposeful complex structures. Why do dead atoms start to order them selves in such a manner that it reflects a purpose to the Observer? Dead atoms and “living atoms” look exactly the same to the physicist.

Another feature of the inquiry into the question of life is the unique posture of the neurons in the array of different cells, forming complex living organisms. Here vertebrate mammals are of course the most conspicuous. The neurons are the cells in which the environmental and interaction reactions of life are controlled through references to stored information. This is taking place primarily in the central nervous systems, which is essentially the part of the living organism where life is sensed. This part of the multiple-cellular organism may pose even more questions than can be raised on the issue of life itself. Some of the biggest and most baffling ones are:

01) Why do most of the neurones DNA seem to throw away the program for the mitoses of their own bodies at the moment of birth? This is the program for their regeneration and they thus fail to replace pathologically or accidentally dead neurones.

02) What program or mechanism regulates the DNA’s production of neuro-transmitters in the neurons of consciousness in the neocortex? How is this related to what the individual is thinking?

03) How are the reality perceptions of the central nervous systems in mammals regulated through the neuro-transmitters?

04) How are the consciousness functions known as learning and memory, regulated by the cerebral community of neurons?

05) What causes the many unexplained neuronal creative learning and memory interactions that have no visible source of initiation?

When we then come to the functions of consciousness, the questions and answer game reaches the edge of the infinite. In this category we have the multitudes of mysteries in the human experience. The multitude of hallucinatory phenomena, and the multitude of mystical phenomena. Neither one is conclusively explained, only described.

The questions about the entity that is asking the questions, is really the ultimate in the game of asking questions. The questions about the existence of Man, his brain and consciousness in relation to the Universe are known as the anthropic questions. The questions regarding Man’s failures in life have a less pompous title but these are really the questions Man should be asking about himself. The motto being that Man’s virtues will not hurt Man, but his vices will. Thus the interest should be with the vices. Philosophy has of course, through the ages, been dealing with the issues on Man’s behavior and his vices. Later this has been undertaken by the would be science of psychology. The jury is still out on the final word on most of these issues regarding Man. However, there are really only two questions from this field that we shall list here:

01) Why does Man so often act against his better judgement? We have the first records of this line of questioning dating back to the Greek philosophers, some 2500 years ago.

02) Does Man posses a natural sense of morality, or is morality an instrument of convenience, as suggested by Thomas Hobbs in the nineteenth century. Did the post war Nuremberg Trials prove him right?

Questions such as these are innumerable. However, there are two categories of riddles regarding the human brain and consciousness that are at the top of such a list. These are the functional disorders of the human brain, which are most apparent in phenomena such as the numerous phobias and psychiatric disorders as well as the difference in intelligence and mental abilities between individuals. The phenomena of the functional disorders appear the most baffling in the phenomena of chemical and psychological addictions. Directly related to the phenomena of the chemical and psychological addictions, is an even more puzzling phenomenon: this is the phenomenon of recovery. Genuine recovery methods, being almost exclusively of a spiritual nature, or in the form of “spiritual programs” with the most efficient one–the 12-steps of AA– having been discovered in the United States in the late-thirties. Up-until that time there was literally no solution available. Addicts would run the full course of the addictions till they met with insanity and premature death, were isolated in asylums, or would destroy themselves against their own will. Only on very rare occasions would they recover through a spiritual experience. The recovery from addiction is described as a miracle by many, since it is not know what happens in the brains and consciousness to bring about the recovery. A genuine miracle is something our sciences have no explanation for. Once we acquire the explanation, it becomes classified as a Law of Nature. One of the more baffling aspects of the process of recovery is the fact that only small portions of those who seek it prove capable of attaining it. The question regarding why this is so may be one of the most important questions in humanity.

The psychological addictions are not just the alcohol and drug addictions, but appear in numerous other compulsions manifesting in the human psyche. Some of the more prominent ones are the nicotine addiction syndrome, over eating, gambling, etc. These deadly compulsions are now treated with the same methods as the ordinary chemical addictions, but modern medicine can do nothing to relive them, other than altering the addictions through drugs.

The suggestion that the answer to this problem is to be found in the incomprehensibly small second fraction of the GUT-era in the First Second of Creation is something that is obviously not easily grasped. However, this is what the famous declaration of Professor Hawking initially presented here at the opening of Chapter Three, Part One, page 55, is suggesting. The author claims further that a solution to the riddles of the addictions that is connected to creation itself is bound to be of interest in many quarters.

After having read numerous suppositions and suggestions on what the final theory in physics may bring, the author has come to the conclusion that the present predicament and the apparent future prospects of Man and his environment demand that such theories include the Observer. This means that a final theory, which does not include an explanation for the phenomena of life, Man’s brain and consciousness, has to be worthless. A Theory of Everything, describing material reality without the inclusion of the Observer, has not only to be a strange phenomenon, but also in relation to its title, incomplete and absurd. Along with a multitude of others contemplating this issue, the author maintains that any such theory is not entitled to such a title. Plato had suggested that Man would never understand the Universe until the smallest components of matter are known.

Also, without Man’s final understanding of himself, his consciousness and brain, he couldn’t understand the Universe. Another compelling fact in this is the statistical nature of the laws of quantum mechanics, which requires the Observer to be a part of the answers. In order to upgrade the target-requirements of physics for a Theory of Everything, here are some arbitrary statements in an axiomatic form: the maxims of the ten axioms. These axioms, which are used here to qualify the author’s understanding of a final Theory of Everything, state that Man cannot know any one of the following truths without at the same time knowing the other. Here then are these aids to the final analysis of the ultimate knowledge:

01) Man cannot achieve an absolute understanding of the creation of the material universe, without achieving at the same time, an absolute understanding of the creation of the substance and the nature of subatomic particles of matter.

02) Man cannot achieve an absolute understanding of the substance and nature of subatomic particles of matter, without at the same time achieving a complete understanding of the forces of Nature and an absolute definition of reality.

03) Man cannot achieve an absolute definition and complete understanding of the forces of Nature and reality without achieving an absolute understanding of the basic nature and workings of the human brain and an absolute definition of the Observer, at the same time.

04) Man cannot achieve an absolute understanding of the basic nature of the workings of the human brain and a definition of the Observer, without gaining at the same time, an absolute understanding of the nature of all the psychiatric malfunctions and addictions that plague these.

05) Man cannot achieve an absolute understanding of the basic nature and workings of the human brain, without knowing at the same time an absolute definition of thoughts, the concept of free will and the riddles of human morality.

06) Man cannot achieve an absolute definition of thought and free will without achieving at the same time an absolute definition of the errors possible in the thinking processes such as delusions and lies.

07) Man cannot achieve an absolute and final understanding regarding the forgone axioms, without achieving an absolute definition of the entity that is making these definitions; Man himself. Further: The relation of Man to the Universe.

08) Man cannot achieve an absolute and final understanding regarding the forgone axioms, without the explanation for the multitude of spiritual and mystical concepts of which Soul, God and Devil are the most important.

09) Man cannot achieve the answer to these questions without resolving the enigma of life; the riddles of the self-organizing ability of atoms in constructing organic molecules, as well as the cell’s specialization and integration abilities. It should eventually resolve all past and persistent disputes regarding Life and suggestions for a Life Force.

10) Man cannot achieve the understanding of the meaning of any of the forgone without first knowing himself.

Reviewing these statements, one common suggestion regarding an ultimate or final theory, comes to mind. This is the one that suggests that the human brain and consciousness may not be capable of understanding the ultimate logic behind the Universe and Life. That Man may not be evolved in such a manner as to permit such an understanding. That our brains may not be wired in a manner that permits an understanding of the Universe. The findings in this book contest this and center on ideas suggesting that Man is indeed qualified for this. As Einstein remarked, the greatest wonder of Man is his ability to understand the Universe. One of the profoundest discovery of QF-theory may be the suggestion that Man is better qualified to exist than his history indicates, and that the potential capacity of the human brain is much greater than most believe and enjoy.

While the QF-theory verifies these ideas, it ultimately comes across a major functional disorder in the human brain, to a greater or lesser extend, in all human brains. They further show that it is the nature of this malfunction that prevents Man’s insights into the ultimate answer, this since it renders him incapable of recognizing the ultimate laws of nature and makes him refuse, or deny these. Much of what is currently being written regarding recent findings in brain research, and the evolution of Man’s predicament, supports this challenging suggestion.

Of the many new discoveries presented in this book, it is the discovery of this malfunction and its consequences, along with the suggestions for its ultimate solution that may be the most significant and important idea presented in this book. This is the explanation of the QF-theory for the mysterious asymmetrical functions observed in the human brain. It is this possibility that frees the author from all concerns that the QF-theory might be received and treated as totally unfounded speculations. It is this possibility that has kept the author going in his work towards the completion of this book. It is this possibility that has sustained the author during all trials and tribulations necessarily associated with such work as this book.

The answers to most of the enigmas listed will have a natural place in the QF-theorizations, and they will arrive at the age-old spiritual conceptual questions and sources of disputes in humanity, mentioned in this list. This includes the question, which seems to be the oldest and bloodiest, and which occupied Fyodor M. Dostoevsky’s mind so profoundly: “Did Man create God, or did God create Man?” To the author, the spiritual riddle of the existence of the Devil is just as pertinent. Man may possibly have a more urgent need to an answer to the Devil spiritual concept in humanity, rather than the God-spiritual concept, since it is the Devil who, in spiritual terms, is harming Man. Not the spiritual realities, relating to the God-spiritual concepts. The interconnected axioms deal with questions which Man has sought the answers to in different forms and whose spiritual aspects have been the sources of infinite arguments in Man’s search for truth. However, not many have sought to gain an understanding of that which we might call an absolute definition of what lies are. The author’s questions and analyzes in the QF-theorizations are not so much concerned with truth, as they are with lies. In his requirements the theory should succeed in discovering the final analyzes of the phenomena of lies, as this relates to the human brain and life. He is thus indirectly involved in the final discovery of truth. A subject that our philosophers and religious sages have been wrestling with ever since the Greeks began their speculations on the question: “Why does Man act against his better judgement?” In this the author believes that lies are a malfunction in the brain, but once this is removed, the truth will be laid bare, as it’s fundamental program.

Well, this is enough of philosophical speculations on Man, but we now turn to the all-important questions as to the “whys” and the “hows” of the apparently unrelated subject of the creation of the Universe and the creation of delusions in the human brain. It was the search for this–along with the need for the clarification of Man’s spiritual concepts–which would lead to the discovery of the QF-theory presented in these writings. Ideas, which would come about through the author’s situation where he–unintentionally and unknowingly–had to find these, or else suffer profusely and then die a premature death.

In this chapter we have looked at some of the prime questions the physicists are seeking the answers to. In reading about the questions, the reader should have become conscious of the fact that the answers being sought are to be found at the quantum level. That the questions and the answers, are objectives of the New Physics, or Quantum Mechanics. In other words, they almost exclusively belong to this realm of physics, which at the end of the twentieth century became a 100-year-old discipline of the sciences. A science discipline, which to the general public, is possibly the least known. Even less known is the fact that the functions of our brains are essentially quantum mechanical functions. The general public may not be aware of the fact that the laws of quantum mechanics are not necessarily those of cause and effect. Much the less that many of the phenomena observed in quantum physics are being described as being bizarre and magical. In the search for the Theory of Everything there are not just the requirement for it to explain why the laws of physics are what they are, but a numerous outrageous phenomena need to be explained as well. Some of the enigmas that need to be solved have been confusing the physicists for the better part of the last century and to some they seem to stick out like sour thumbs. Mysteries that are so baffling that the joke is that they have turned physicists into gardeners. The better known of these are the so-called "double slit experiment" with the questions: "What is behind the uncertainty principle, when it comes to the ground state of the electron in the atom?" and "What is behind the week coupling constant?"

When it comes to the grandest of the unanswered questions in cosmology, the QF-theory may fall somewhat short of being a theory of all possible answers. The nature of the answers may be of measurements and observations. However, the QF-quantum mechanical models may possibly solve theoretically such cosmological enigmas as the question of the dark matter in the Universe. The question as to what mass it is that holds the galaxies together, or what their anchorage is. It has been known since 1935 that there is as much as 90% to 99% more matter mass in the galaxies, than is visible through the nuclear fusion burning of the baryon nuclear fuel in the suns. They may not be able to answer the questions as to whether the universe is open or closed. This may be a question for measurements to resolve, but currently astrophysicists are coming up with some profoundly strange measurements regarding the cosmic constant according to which the Universe is accelerating outward, rather than being slowed down by gravity. These are the newest and most startling provisional findings in cosmology by two separate teams, or those of Dr. Bryan Schmidt of the Australian National University and Dr. Saul Perlmutter of the Lawrence Berkley Laboratory. This appears to throw some of the laws of physics to the wind. Dennis Overbye’s brilliant 1991 book LONELY HEARTS OF THE COSMOS, shows us how the cosmic constant as a reference for the expansion of the Universe has been a sticky problem for a better part of the last century.

Yes, the most important questions we may ask of a Theory of Everything will of course have to do with Man and his future. The reply that Confucius used to give to people, who asked him if there was life before this life, or if there was life after this life, may apply to some of the questions the cosmologists are asking. “Try first to figure out how this life you are currently situated in should be. Perhaps the answer to the other questions will then come clear to you.”

No school of questioning or collection of enigmas is richer than when it comes to the questions around Man’s brain and consciousness. Here we may find some questions which appear very insignificant, and whose answers may actually be the subtlest truths of the first order of importance in Man's search for the understanding of himself and the Universe. The profoundest of these is the “riddle of the filters”, which goes like this: After the middle of the century, our neurologists finally attained decisive abilities in dissecting the human brain. This to the extent that in the neurological dissection, they could establish that there was no significant difference between the brain of a low intelligence person, and a high intelligence person. Sometime later our technicians managed to produce brain scanners that could reflect on to a TV-screen a view inside the living human brain, showing the extent of activity. Of course the scanner did not show what the person was thinking, only the degree of activity in the thought processes. Researchers have thus taken a low intelligence person, and a high intelligence person, and attached them to such scanners, in separate quarters. Each of them was then asked to solve the same riddle and the screen monitored while they sought the answer. The difference between the two was that the one we classify as the high intelligence person, showed relatively little activity in the brain, and came up with the right answer in a relatively short time. The person we classify as being of low intelligence, showed relatively great activity in the brain, which did not produce the answer, even though allowed a relatively long time. The difference in the functions of the brains of the two individuals being observed is that we find in the low intelligence person, what we generally call functional disorders of the human brain. Extreme cases of these present us with the psychiatric disorders. What these “functional differences” are, and how they come about, no one knows. What we know is that they are, to a lesser, or greater extend, in the brains of us all.

Fred Allan Wolf, in the brilliant introduction to his brilliant book, The New Physics for Non-scientists, TAKING THE QUANTUM LEAP, tells us how the physicists, who made the first observations of quantum phenomena, became aware of these functional disorders in them selves. They realized that they were looking at the world through filters. Filters, which they did not know what were, nor understand. To this day they still do not know what these filters are, but they may “taint” all what we are observing, whether it be looking at the smallest objects in experimental particle physics, or the largest objects in the cosmological research. The quest to achieve an understanding of these filters may possibly be the most important of all of Man’s endeavors. This book engages in dealing with this question. This may possibly represent what we discussed here prior as the phenomenon of lies and may well be described as the central theme of this book. It is thus the Observer Connection of the QF-theoretical models that the author believes will eventually provide the answers to all fundamental questions regarding Man. This means that the findings of these simplistic CUT/TOE theories, as they relate to the Observer, imply that they will eventually prove to be an imperative knowledge for the survival and future of Man in general. Yet, Man, in his arrogance, may quite easily choose to ignore them, just like the author initially tried to do, and almost died ignoring and denying the lies in his brain-functions.

This then will have to do as a most unusual introduction to the questions involved in these most unusual theorization–and for that matter–most unusual writings in general. It is in fact very doubtful that any introduction can fully prepare the reader for what follows. This might require volumes of writings and a brilliant writer. The philosophical and theological implications involved in a final Complete Unified Theory/Theory of Everything will necessarily take on grandiose proportions. This cannot be helped. It is thus most natural that numerous difficulties have been encountered in the development and presentation of these ideas. These are obviously due to the author’s vocational and educational limitations, both in language and in technical knowledge, as well as his economic circumstances. However, here the author is saved by the very simplistic nature of the QF-theory.

This, once again, calls for the words of Ludwig Boltzmann, which Albert Einstein quoted at the beginning of his publication of the general relativity theory: “Matters of elegance should be left to the tailor and the cobbler.”

"If this law is found, it could prove almost meaningless, or it could lead to a new golden age of science. Scientists don't know just as they had no idea that Einstein's unification of mass and energy would lead to the age of the atom. Or that quantum mechanics, the mathematical system used by physicists to explain the movements of sub-atomic particles, would be used to make the first laser. Yet, a unification theory remains an almost religious vision to some scientists, a Zen-like view of reality in which all the forces and matter in nature come from a single source."

According to the findings of modern cosmology, we live in a solar system that is situated in the suburbs–about 30.000 light-years from the center–of an ordinary galaxy; our Milky Way. The galaxy is one of 100.000.000.000 such galaxies, give or take a few billion. The spiral-shaped galaxies are of various types and are spread out forming walls of galaxies, with immense bubble shaped voids in between, throughout the observable Universe. The galaxies, as our Milky Way galaxy, average each about 100.000.000.000 suns/stars of various sizes and the visible Universe thus contains about 100.000.000.000 times 100.000.000.000 suns/stars give or take a few billion. According to cosmology the Universe started in what is called the Big Bang, which took place some 15.000.000.000 terrestrial years ago give or take some 3 billion years. This Universe of ours–not just the matter in it, but the space/time part of it as well–has been expanding, ever since it banged. The fruits of Man’s endeavor in understanding his environment and himself in it, have further shown us that our solar system and our planet is about 4.600.000.000 terrestrial years old, give/take a few hundred million years. One of the major wonders of these discoveries has been the conclusion that almost all the heavier atoms in the Universe today, have been fused together in what is known as stellar nucleon synthesis. They were then spewed out into the surrounding space when the stars they were created in, were burned out and died, since some of them die in supernovae explosions. We are further told that the atoms in all the planets that revolve around our sun, including our planet, went through the same metamorphoses.

From being simple hydrogen, helium and lithium atoms created shortly after the Big Bang, they became the heavier atoms that are found today. This took place in what is called the first generation of suns (stars) that were formed some five billion terrestrial years after creation. This means that the atoms in our bodies were initially created in the Big Bang, some 15.000.000.000 (±3.000.000.000) years ago. Then, some 5.000.000.000 years after the Big Bang these atoms were formed in a star that lived about 5.000.000.000 years. The death of that star providing the matter for what we know as planets, circling and revolving around our same age sun, for 4.600 to 5.000 million terrestrial years. The consequence of this is that the prime atom of our DNA structure, the code of life, is built mostly around the carbon atom consisting of 6 electrons, 6 protons and 6 neutrons. As the carbon atom was formed in a sun that has died in order for us to be created, we humans are made of star stuff. A closer look at the order of events on the cosmic calendar of the blue planet we are a part of, shows us that life began sometime between 4000 to 3.200 million years ago.

Initially life began as a single-cell organism called prokaryotes, since their single strand simplistic DNA was not contained in a nucleus encasing. These were mainly bacteria and amoebas that remained the only form of life for the next 2.500 million years. This form of life did not know sex or death and thus remained unchanged (must have been a terrible bore), continuing itself through cell division called progeny. It was this life that formed the basis of the biosphere on the planet in order to provide a biological environment for the development of higher forms of life. This began about 1.500 million years ago with the invention of cells called eukaryotes, since they developed a twofold Double Helix DNA in a nucleus membrane encasing. They invented sex and death which then 800 years later lead to multi-cellular organism. Then about 560 million years ago, the variety in the forms of life was catapulted in an extraordinary evolutionary acceleration known as the Cambrian explosion, which produced a great variety of life of which we now are a part. This took place in the seas resulting in the first primitive aquatic vertebrates coming into existence and lead to the first land vertebrates appearing 175 million years later, or 365 million years ago, and mammals 200 million years ago. On a galactic time-scale, the time since the appearance of the mammals is same as the time our solar system travels one circle around the center of the Milky Way. The greatest marvel of it all is perhaps the fact that Man has been able to figure this out!

During the latter part of “the march of the time/life continuum”, the reign of the giant reptiles, the dinosaurs, started some 225 million years ago and lasted for about 160 million years. This form of Life came to an apparently abrupt end through some natural catastrophe some 66 million years ago. Many of the species of Man the Wise, who have been around for less than 2 million years, see themselves as the most successful form of life, and in turn regard the dinosaurs, as having been unsuccessful. This in spite of the fact that Man has only been around for 1/80 of the time that the dinosaurs ruled the earth. Man, who is apparently approaching a major dilemma regarding his own continued existence, is faced with some sort of an unnatural catastrophe that is taking place within his own head; the head of Man the Wise. In a grander perspective than the everyday survival references of Man, this does indeed appear as a colossal arrogance relative to life, considering the fact that Man does not know why his situation is as it is, and Man’s refusal to admit the truth of the situation. Man’s most primitive ancestors, the pre-primates, came into existence 70 million years ago, and about 5 million years ago, the humanoid species separated from the other apes and became upright 3.7 million years ago. The Homo Erectus, or what has been termed the first true Man, then appeared in what is now China, some 1.8 to 1.7 million years ago. The origin of a primate that is in the same form as we find ourselves, Homo Sapiens or Man the Wise, can be traced with considerable accuracy, 600.000 years before the present times. Another wonder is that most of the cosmological facts we posses were compiled in recent times, or on a cosmic time-scale which represents the equivalent of a split second. On this scale, only 130 years ago, the approximate distance to the Sun was established. Archeology has shown that our ancestors started using language 40.000 years ago. The first forming of cities came with the cultivation of wheat and rice 10.000 years ago and the first calendar some 6.700 years ago, writing 5.500 years ago.

Archeology further informs us and this is the crazy part that we Homo Sapiens or Men the Wise, have practiced being at each-others throats and killing our own kind as far back as we can look. The causes have invariably been the gifts of creation, disputed ideologies regarding how Man should live, or what he should believe and how, regarding a reality which he calls God. By the same token, the science of Zoology tells us that the practice of killing one’s own species is generally not found in the animal kingdom. Indeed, it is the lesser beings on the planet that are suggesting to us that there is possibly something unnatural about the behavior of the master of the planet.

Looking at the history of the last century, where our knowledge of nature has been advanced to the point of completion, we see our grand efficiency in the destruction of our own kind. This once to the tune of some 50 to 60 million of the species, in five years. Prior to that, we practiced with a less efficient exercise of similar kind that netted 20 million lives. Untold millions have been wounded or have had to suffer mental anguish due to this. The summary of this indicates that during the 20th century more than 100 million humans have had to die premature deaths due to political conflicts. This means a million every year, or about 83.500 every month, which means about 2.750 each day, or 115 every hour, 2 every minute. These political events have been taking place for as long as we have recorded history.

To add to the picture of the technological advances of Man, he has now succeeded in bringing his conflicts visually and audibly into his living rooms presently as they take place. Here we meet with one of the many strange paradoxes of Man which became apparent when this occurred in a nation partaking in one such conflict, where the nation sacrificed over 50.000 dead and 500.000 wounded in a relatively small, none local conflict, that spanned some ten years. The paradox being the fact that at the same time, the same amount of casualties was taking place annually in traffic accidents on this nation’s local territory, which is further found to be the case in most countries of the planet.

This brief none-precision account of the time/life evolution, is intended to draw attention to the apparently accelerated pace of what may be called “The homo sapience time/life events”. This is done in order to draw attention the weirdest of all of Man’s behavior. His 20th century’s cold war stockpiling of 30 to 50.000 thermonuclear warheads, a process that began about the middle of the century. Of this arsenal, 10% is said to suffice to eradicate all life on the planet. Added to this are untold quantities of weapons of mass destruction in the chemical and viral or micro-organic form. Now after the millennium thaw in the east-west relations, the disposing of these weapons still remains a major problem, which is yet another unexplained paradox.

While busy making nuclear fission and fusion devices, Man has made some rocket excursions to the earth satellite, the moon and at the same time excursions into ever-smaller constituents of the microcosms of the material world, dividing the atom into ever-smaller fragments. This is being done in order to understand how everything was and is made, and possibly, how and why the Universe and Man himself exist. Presently, while all this is going on, about 16.000 die of hunger every day. This is about 666 every hour, about 11 every minute, or 1 every 5 seconds. All this in turn makes some humans wonder why life bothered to evolve from being bacteria or amoeba. Others suggest that this then has been life’s ultimate error; invention of sex and death. All kidding aside, these are but a few points to ponder regarding the acceleration of events, versus Man's time/life evolution.

With the onset of the twentieth century, Man’s gathering of facts concerning the Universe and himself in it were accelerated enormously. However, all the wonders and amazement of our achievements and abilities to think and deduct the truths about creation and the laws of the Universe, and the joy of the knowledge and technical abilities that have come with them, are over-shadowed at the end of the twentieth century. The culmination point in our questions and answers game with nature is being shadowed with the most unpleasant question of our continued existence.

In the universal, galactic, planetary, life evolutionary time-scale the time of Man seems but a fleeting second. Yet it is Man, who possesses the marvelous ability of deciphering the secrets of the Universe and has the ability to understand it all, who has now maneuvered his evolution into an abyss, which is partially produced by Man’s marvelous reasoning abilities. The main doubts we are faced with have to do with the threats to our continued existence. Threats that are not only produced by our self-destruct devices and our pollution of the biosphere we live in, but threats of the collapse of the systems that we live by. The suggestion is that there is more than just one bomb ticking.

Questions about the future have with the aid of computers been quite cleverly formulated and projected, most notably in a scientific inquiry in the United States in 1977. In this speculation, several known factors, in the time/life evolution of Man’s vital interactive functions, were projected and found to collapse somewhere between the years 2005 and 2010. Among these were such factors as collapses of energy sources, raw material sources, economic systems, food production and capital availability. This was all crowned by an accompanying runaway population growth and environmental pollution. Man’s activation of his self-destruct devices–nuclear holocaust–was not considered in this prognosis. Neither was Man coming to his good senses or to his reason, in this Age of Reason. This suggests that we do not believe in such possibilities or perhaps we do not even believe in reason itself. One of the major horrors not generally discussed is the collapse of law and order, but with the collapse of former Soviet Union and the ensuing hidden anarchy in the countries emerging from the remains, has made this more visible. Of particular concern is the unmanageability of the nuclear and chemical arsenals, but in the world in general accelerating growth of terrorist activity has become a major scare. Law and order being something, which to many seems the only thing that sustains civilization.

A part of the human culture–for as long as Man has records–is the other, even less discussed invisible horror, whose subtle collective effects make it the most threatening of all. These are Man's addiction sicknesses. In the first quarter of the twentieth century, the addicted percentage of the populace of western cultures was estimated around 5%. Now at the millennium, this percentage is estimated to be 25%. Alcohol 15%, illegal drugs 5% and legal drugs, or abused medication 5%.

This syndrome carries with it the co-addiction syndrome, but research indicates that for every addict, there are 3 individuals effected psychologically and behaviorally. As the number of effected individuals increase, so does society’s denial of the malady. The scope and the collective effect of this brain pollution cannot be fully appreciated until the brain is fully understood. Whatever the accuracy of these prognosis the unalienable fact remains that the birth/death cycles of the time/life evolution, is headed for self-destruction and its ingredient parts do not know why. Since the year 1977 is only a cosmic-, galactic-, planetary-, life-evolutionary split second ago, and our doubts of the future are still mounting, an increasing number of humans are coming to the conclusion that; “There is something rotten with the state of the planet.” It is indeed an outrage, that Man, in spite of all the wonders of his intelligence, abilities and achievements, is the cause for the doubts about his own future. There have been, and there are those who are not even satisfied with these questions, but have gone so far as to ask questions concerning Man's health and happiness and quality of Man's life. Here, both the philosophies and the sciences of Man are still hard at work trying to figure out the age-old questions: Why do we exist? What are we doing here? What is the purpose of Life? Even the question, What is Man? This has not yet been answered in such a manner as to make the answer indisputable and conclusive.

Our psychology/psychiatry sciences have been unable to come up with conclusive answers as to why we are, as we appear to be. Man’s religions have also been and are dealing with these questions. A part of the religious activity of Man is mystical projections called prophecies, and some of them have been prophesied catastrophic events in the future. As far back as we have records of such prophecies, there have been Men who believed them to be coming into reality in their time. Now at the end of the twentieth century it may be said that: Never before, in recorded history, have there been so many prepared to believe so much, of such prophesies of doom. All this is being read in the signs of the times but the core of the problem is reflected in the 1992 words of Harvard rector, Professor Gerald D. Fischbach, presented at the beginning of this chapter. This concludes the overview of the time/life continuum and we can begin our overview of the end phase of the history of human knowledge.

Throughout recorded history Man has been wrestling with the question of an all-embracing knowledge. A Lagrangian, or a recipe for the Universe, which today is called the Theory of Everything. This was initially the goal of mysticism and occultism in the religions. At the onset of the former age of enlightenment, Greek philosophers, such as the atomist, Democritus, began investigating nature in reductionistic terms. This would later come into conflict with the holistic approach of Aristotle. Thus began the still continuing conflict between the philosophical spiritualists and materialistic empiricists at which the philosopher Protagoras intoned fittingly: “Man is the arbitrator of all things.” To clarify the differences between the science believers and religious believers is one of the many goals of the theorizations in this book.

Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543), Galileo Galilee (1564-1642), Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) and René Descartes (1596-1650) at the onset of the rebirth period of the Renaissance–the age of reason, the later age of enlightenment–would then inject renewed vigor into the search for an understanding of Nature and the Universe. Descartes had a spiritual experience on the 10th of November 1619 and acquired enthusiastic visions of achieving an all-embracing knowledge through what he called The Admirable Science which may well be histories first idea for a Theory of Everything. His DISCOURSE ON METHOD and PRINCIPLES OF PHILOSOPHY recommends the route for the progression of the sciences through; investigations and verification by mathematics. A method fashioned initially by Aristotle and reinstated by Galilee. This vision remained with him throughout his life.

Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626), in NOVUM ORGANUM and THE GREAT INSTAURATION, suggested the method for creation of mathematical thought models with an eventual verification in experiments, or ratification by Nature. He visioned Man's knowledge structured as a pyramid, with an ultimate top-stone that explained everything, or a sort of Theory of Everything. A top-stone that by it self was a pyramid, without which the pyramid was not a pyramid. It was not complete. Here some people believe this to be the idea behind the eye in the top-stone in the pyramid symbol, in the Great Seal of the United States. It is this idea of Bacon that is behind the pyramid logo of this book.

The appearance of Sir Isaac Newton with his two greatest works; MATHE- MATICAL PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY and OPTICS, is one of the most important events in the history of science. Newton not only employed reductionistic methods, but also created his own mathematics. In 1666, Newton investigated the phenomena of light, resolving the spectrum of light through his famous and brilliant experiment with the Prism, and created the calculus, which later spawned Boolean Algebra of Logic and the Venn Diagrams of Set-Mathematics, which this book is based on. He then presented his detailed mathematical explanations for the phe- nomenon of motion and gravity in 1687.

In this discovery may be seen the onset of the investigation into the quantum nature of the Universe. Why are the fundamental colors only three? Why are they red, blue and yellow? Why does the blue and yellow mix so distinctly (into green), but not the red and the yellow (orange)? Why are these colors packed together into colorless white light in the photon? These properties of Nature become–along with the particle spin characteristics–one of two prime backbones of the QF-model creation.

The crossroad event in the evolution of the religious-spiritual, scientific-investigative disputes of conflicting findings, was the appearance of the controversial science genius of Sir Charles Darwin (1809-1882). His presentation in 1859, of the; ON THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES, may be seen as the onset of the investigation into the DNA. His book shook the world–and still shakes the minds of some. It sold out on the first day of its publication.

At the dawn of the 20th century it was discussed in the Royal Society whether it should not be closed since everything knowable was known. In Germany the patent office in Berlin was terminated in the year 1900, on the grounds that all there was to be discovered, was already discovered. However, the nineteenth centuries physics legacy to the twentieth, was not only discoveries that needed expanded understanding, but further, numerous unresolved enigmas. In the 20th century, Thomas Young’s (1773-1829) nineteenth century discovery of the phenomenon of interference, helped to establish the wave nature of light, but the quantum riddles associated with this phenomena would continue to be the central mystery of the New Physics at the end of the twentieth century. John Dalton (1766-1844) had laid the foundations of the atomic theory upon which modern physical science would be founded. Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleyev’s (1834-1907) had published in 1869 his first version of what became known as the periodic table, in which he demonstrated the periodic law. In 1871 he then published an improved version of the periodic table, in which he left gaps for elements that were not yet known. Hans Christian Oersted’s, (1777-1851) had in 1819 made discoveries regarding magnetism that would later influence the works of Michael Faraday (1791-1867) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) in the resolving of the electro-magnetic phenomena. Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen (1845-1923) discovery of X-rays in 1895, and in 1896 Antoine Henri Becquerel (1852-1908) radiation in Uranium. This was then followed by the beginnings of the initiation of the real search for the fundamental constituent of matter by Sir Joseph John Thomson’s (1856-1940) discovery of the electron in 1898. The opening of the quantum age would then be the next logical step. The age of the New Physics was set in motion by Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck (1858-1947) resolving of the black body radiation ultra violet catastrophe in 1900.

It was on the 14th of December 1900 that the New Physics of quantum mechanics were born when Max Plank presented the findings of his investigation into the ultraviolet part of blackbody radiation and solved the enigma of the so-called ultra-violet catastrophe. This was the 397th anniversary of the birthday of Michael de Notredame (1503-1566), the man who is said to have prophesied about the atomic sciences. At the time it was generally assumed that physics could explain everything, only one thing seemed to throw a shadow, but this was the fact that ultraviolet radiation violated the known laws of Nature. Plank’s finding destroyed this believe of Man. With the evolution of the New Physics, or Quantum Physics, Man acquired his second class of Laws of Physics. This is a science that tells us that the material Universe – even Space itself – is composed of energy units whose smallest division is one quanta. The story of its development is one of the more magnificent parts in the history of Man's search for knowledge. Now, at the end of the twentieth century, this science has brought about the possibility for the discovery of Man’s ultimate and final knowledge.