Back to First part of Two of this PART:
Part One,
Chapter
Four
The
Overview
of
the References
Overview
of
the
Search for the
Ultimate Theory
of the Universe
"I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element; I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details."
Albert
Einstein
John D. Barrow
Models of the Fundamental particles.
 |
“All our models of fundamental particles and their interactions are no more than artificial aids to help us to get a picture of what is going on in terms what seem familiar, or at least recognizable, from every day life… In recent years many accounts of particle physics seem to have lost sight of the fact that even the best of our models are no more than aids to the imagination, and those accounts have begun to present an image of protons, neutrons, and the rest as made up of ‘real’ little hard lumps, the quarks, which rattle around inside what we used to think of as the ‘fundamental’ particles. The image is beguilingly reminiscent of the early vision of the atom as being made up of little hard lumps, electrons, protons and neu- trons–and just as inaccurate… The everyday particles, the proton and neutron and the pions that carry the strong force can all be described simply in terms of two quarks, which are given arbitrary labels to distinguish them from one another. One is called ‘up’ and the other is called ‘down’. The names have no significance; physicists could just as well, if they wish, call one quark ‘Alice’ and the other 'Albert.'"* |
Figure 017
Since the birth of high-energy particle physics, the way physicists have been seeing the invisible fundamental particles has changed as follows:
a)
As points,
or dimensionless points with mass and with, or without electrical
charge, spinning internally and in
space. The general term is Particles.
b)
As waves, either
smeared-out in space, or confined to small regions. Their function
is called The Wave
Function.
c)
As
strings, which
is the latest variation of form that with the application of super-symmetry mathematics
become the Superstrings.
The Fermions, - the Permanent Matter Particles.
The
Particles that
are known as FERMIONS.
Permanent
Matter
(Antimatter not shown).
 |
Figure 018
Mass in units of
electron
mass now believed to be 1/17000, or 0,000.000.001 in multiples of
proton
mass. Charge = 0. Spin = -1/2, half-integer/integral, means only
left-handed
spin exists for matter Ve. ELECTRON - denoted e-.
DOWN QUARK - denoted d.
Mass in units of electron mass = 6. Rest mass = 0.3. Mass in terms of multiples of proton mass .0074. Charge -1/3 of proton charge. Spin = ±1/2, half-integer/integral.
UP
QUARK - denoted u.
Mass in units of
electron
mass = 2. Rest mass = 0.3. Mass in terms of in multiples of proton mass
.0047. Charge +2/3 of proton charge. Spin = ±1/2,
half-integer/integral.
The QF-theory
classifies the Fermions
further
into two categories, which are in fact two different realities:
“OUT-DIMENSIONAL
EXPLICATE REALITY”
These are
particle
realities outside the nucleus.
“IN-DIMENSIONAL
IMPLICATE REALITY”
These are
particle
realties inside the nucleus.
Oh là là! Is that all that there is to it? Yes, that is all there is to the material Universe! This is what the atoms are made of and consequently our DNA, neurones, bodies, brains and all. All these particles then have the potential ability of appearing in their complete mirror opposites forming antimatter. It is out of the two last types of the Fermion matter particles–the quarks –that the two types of stable nucleons (baryon hadrons), the neutron and the proton, are formed. The quarks have not been found to exist independently outside of the nucleons (baryon hadrons), but this is known as quark confinement and this nature of matter is of special interest in the QF-theorizations. In addition to the four stable particles that constitute the building blocks of the atoms, physicists have found a number of other unstable particles. These now exceed 200, of which most are extremely unstable. Of these, only the meta-stable ones are interesting. In the search for the answers to the enigmas of the final CUT/TOE paradigm, they serve in a supportive role. Some of these are the enlarged copies of the electron and neutrinos that accompany them. These are the higher energy generations of the electron. The Muon, with 207 electron masses, the Tauon with its 3451 or 3536 electron masses. The same is true for massive copies of quarks producing the short lived higher energy generations of the up and down quarks that produce heavy baryon type particles known as hyperons. These heavy quarks are named: Charm, Strange, Bottom and Top. Particles known as resonances, or splinters, are of lesser interest in solving the enigma regarding the Universe.
The Bosons, - the Force Carrier Particles.
The
Particles that
are known as BOSONS.
The
Force-carrying
Particles, Quanta of Energy-Fields.
 |
Figure 019
These
are the Bosons,
the particles that carry the four forces of nature. Their prime feature
of interest is their SPIN characteristics, but all the force carriers
are
whole integer spin. This is opposed to the matter particles, the Fermions,
which all have 1/2 integer spin characteristics. Force carriers are
further
capable of having many of themselves being packed together in the same Bosons.
Again, this is opposed to the matter particles, the Fermions,
which can never have two of the same kind occupying the same spot. The
reasons for these rules for the groups of matte/energy are one of the
many
enigmas of the quantum reality.
Mass in units of electron mass = 0. Spin = ±1 integer/integral. In quantum theory of radiation, the particle associated with a light wave or electromagnetic waves. Carriers of electric charge. Create electromagnetic waves. Binds electrons to nucleus. Interact with charged hadrons and leptons.
Mass
in units of electron mass = W boson 86 GeV,
Z
boson 97 GeV. All spin = ±1 (2, 3, etc.)
integer/integral.
The W boson is intermediary bosons
that mediate the weak interaction. The Z
bosons are heavy neutral bosons that mediate neutral-current force.
Cause
radioactive decay processes of hadrons and baryons. Interact with all
hadrons
and leptons. 
Mass
in units of electron or proton mass = ±0. Spin = ???.
Electrically
neutral objects, that mediate the interactions between quarks within
the
framework of quantum chromo dynamics inside the hadrons. Particles,
that
carry the strong interaction between quarks. Binds quarks permanently
inside
hadrons. Exist and interact only inside of hadrons, as a part of the
hadron,
but are considered as having been observed, in the form of “jets”, in
accelerator
experiments. 
This
is the field energy quanta that carries the strong nuclear force
between
the baryon hadrons in the nuclei. They are two quark systems particles
classified as hadrons. They appear in variable masses with whole
integer
spins and interact only with
hadrons. These appear
primarily in three main families: The pions,
kaons
and the deltas, with several other variations appearing depending on
the
type of quarks they are composed of. The Japanese physicist Yukawa
Hideki made a theoretical prediction for the existence of the
mesons
in 1935. 
This
is a hypothetical energy quanta, which represent the matter side of
gravity
and which to this date has only appeared in the mathematics of the
theorists.
Its mass is in units of electron or proton mass = 0. Spin = ±2
integer.
It is the quanta, which interacts with everything and binds planets to
the suns and galaxies. It has not been detected in any experiments, and
it is apparently not expected to be found anywhere, except in the
mathematics
of the theorists, or the QF-models for
the gravitons. This is the part of General
Relativity that Einstein claimed to be “written
in straw.” Note: The QF-bosons are located in Dualistic Reality situated between the reality of the
Fermion’s, Out-dimensional explicate reality and the In-dimensional implicate reality.
The Briefest
Possible
History of the Birth of Time
with Emphasis
on
the First Second of Creation.
 |
Figure 020
Figure 020 shows the two Big Bang models in an overview time/volume graph of the original Standard Model and a revised Inflationary Model.
The QF-theory is an Inflationary Model and therefore references have been sought in such models by physics. Following is a review of the physics analyzes of the First Second, but in the last introductory chapter we look at the foremost assumptions in the QF-creation theory. This is the idea of a singularity at the beginning, which is also the initial causative in the QF-theory. The prime approach of physics is via the route of working backwards towards the beginning of creation, the beginning of the creation of time. The first three minutes of the history of time are an important part of the creation process, with the First Second being ultimately the most important part of all. Physics has been capable of reconstructing events reasonably accurately as far as Second 10-35 into the First Second. It is from there on, backwards to a point known as the “Planck Energy” or the “Planck Wall” at Second 10-43, which is the ultimate challenge of physics. Physicists are working to examining the nature of the First Second, by taking it apart and chopping-it-up into 45, ever decreasing mathematical time divisions. Before we get going with the theorizations, we need to help ourselves to an understanding of this fractionalization, or this chopping up of the second. The dissection of the second is for the purpose of locating, identifying, and establishing the nature and duration of the creation events. The divisions of the second are represented in log 10 powers, witch means that progressing into the second, each increment is ten times smaller than the last, as expressed in the graph in Figure 011. Thus in the language of mathematics, the very last fraction of the First Second would be written as Second 10-45. This is also expressed as being the:
1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
part of the second. Here we may gain an appreciation of how mathematics can deal in precision with unbelievably minute, almost infinitely small, concepts. At the point of the fraction of Second 10-43 we reach a point beyond which absolutely no information is available or possible, neither through observations, mathematics or the laws of physics. This is the “Planck Wall”. In an attempt at achieving a clear picture of how the world’s physicists deal with the fractions of The Universes’ First Second, we have put together a list of the simplest and best data we can get from our physicist. These are the general outlines of what the physics have discovered regarding The First Second of Creation. Since the author is interpreting his visions on the basis of the findings of physics, the next chapter repeats this for the QF-approach.
Enigma of the GUT/TOE ERA of Creation.
The First Markers.
|
to one ten-thousandth (10-4) of the First Second. Ca
30 Minutes to ca 3 Minutes:
Ca
3 Minutes to ca 1 Second:
The Beginning of the First Second. Second
1 to ca Second 0,0001 (Second 100
to 10-4):
|
The Second Markers.
|
#01
= Second 10-04:
#02
= Second 10-05:
#03
= Second 10-06:
#04
= Second 10-10:
#05
= Second 10-12:
#06
= Second 10-14:
#07
= Second 10-15:
#08
= Second 10-20:
#09
= Second 10-25:
#10
= Second 10-30:
#11
= Second 10-32:
|
Next are the
real mystery
parts of the First Second of Creation
The Third Markers.
|
Starts at about Second 10-33; ends at Second 10-42. This is the GUT/TOE ERA of Physics. #12
= Second 10-33:
#13
= Second 10-35: #14
= Second 10-36:
#15
= Second 10-37
to
Second 10-38: #16
= Second 10-42: |
The Fourth and Last Marker.
|
Wall at Second 10-43 or Planck Energy of 1027 GeV. #17
= Second 10-43:
|
of the Physicists First Second of Creation.
Logarithm 10 “Time Relation Reference” Comparison.
Figure 021
This is as far as we can go with this graphical method of showing the differences between the increments in Figure 022. On the next page we have the continuation of this without the graphical centimeter yardsticks, but with the numerical meter increments.
Second 10-40
= 1 meter.
Second 10-39
= 10 meters.
Second 10-38
= 100 meters.
Second 10-37
= 1.000 meters/1 km.
Second 10-36
= 10.000 meters/10 km.
Second 10-35
= 100.000 meters/100 km.
(10.000
km is 1/4 of earth’s 40.000 km. polar circumference)
Second 10-30
= 10.000.000 km.
(Distance
to the sun is about 93.000.000 miles or 150.000.000 km)
Second 10-20
= 100.000.000.000.000.000 km.
Second 10-10
= 1.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 km.
The
Physicists Graphical
First Second Continuum.
Theoretical
Events
and Calculated Conditions.
 |
Physicists
estimate
the Diameter of the Universe to be from 4 light years
to the infinite
at
the end of the First Second.
Figure 022
The Physicists Pictorial First Second Continuum.
 |
Figure 023
This
graphic
is by Chuck Carter. Its reprint is made possible through the kind
permission
of its copyright holder, National Geographic Society January 1994.
Graph of the First Second Continuum.
01) Scientists use the term Big Bang to describe this moment of creation. Somehow the Universe–all matter, energy, space and time–exploded from the original singularity.
02) Because time did not yet exist, there is no way to measure this event, but scientists have agreed to start the Universal clock at Planck time-a moment defined as Second 10-43, which is a decimal point followed by 42 zeros and a 1. Named for the father of quantum physics, Plank time is the point at which the Universe begins to differentiate.
03) Gravity becomes a separate force, tearing away from the other still unified basic forces of nature.
04) Separation of the strong force at Second 10-36. Although atoms do not yet exist, the forces that will hold their nuclei together become an individual entity.
05) Inflation from Second 10-36 until Second 10-32. This is triggered by the separation of the strong force, the Universe expands more in this instant than it has in the roughly 15 billion years since.
06) Quarks/anti-quarks form from Second 10-32 to Second 10-5. As inflation ends, the still expanding Universe now teems with quarks and anti-quarks–the smallest known constituents of matter along with electrons (L in the illustration) and exotic particles (W and Z). Quarks and anti-quarks annihilate each other upon contact. But a surplus of quarks will ultimately combine to form matter.
07) At Second 10-12 the final two forces split off. Electro-magnetism, the attraction of negative and positively charged particles–is carried by photons, the basic units of electro-magnetic energy.
08) The weak force controls certain forms of radioactive decay and initiates nuclear reactions.
09) Quark confinement comes about at Second 10-5. As the Universe cools to one trillion K, when trios of quarks form protons and neutrons. – The First Second ends here!
10) Nucleon synthesis (less than one second to three minutes) cooling continues and neutrons bind to form the nuclei of soon to-be-formed atoms.
11) From the "time" of Second 10-32 and until 3.000 years later, energy dominates the Universe.
12) Matter begins to dominate from 3.000 years onward. With cooling, matter becomes the primary source of gravity. Matter begins to lump and form structures. In theory, particles of so-called dark matter, which may account for as much as 99 percent of all matter (depicted as gray bubbles) would have come into existence by this time.
13) Decoupling takes place at about 300,000 year. Continued expansion and cooling allow matter an electromagnetic energy to go their separate ways. Nuclei capture electrons to form complete atoms of hydrogen, helium and lithium. The Universe becomes transparent: Radiant energy/photons travels freely.
14) These photons now exist through the Universe as microwave radiation. They reveal ripple-like concentrations of primordial matter-seeds for the structure of the Universe that arose during the era of inflation. The ripples are shown in a 1992 COBE satellite image.”
However, in all the brilliance of the M-Theory of Everything, no light was shed on the missing Observer's connection, which seemed to be completely forgotten as a vital ingredient and the M-theory turned out as a Theory of Something. This the QF-theory explains as being caused by the physicist’s denial of the 1931 published mathematical Incompleteness Theorem by Kurt Gödel (see pages 106 to 108). The QF-brain models claimed that in the saloons of the brain's mathematical mirrors--at the limits of mathematics--endless dimensional creations and renormalization aberrations, replaced reality and turned science into science fiction. The God playing string-brane physicists even toyed with creating their own universe in the laboratory while in denial of the continuation of Gödel's legacy in the 1981 Nobel Prize findings of Roger Sperry (page 108)--vital insights that tell us that the mathematical hemisphere alone lacked the power to deal with the problems at the leading edge of physics--were ignored. This left the physicists in the conundrums of the fallacy of fancy mirror mathematics, as they refuse to accept the fact that without its ego bolstering magic, they would become ordinary mortals like the rest of us.
Notwithstanding this, plus the physicists denial of the demand for the inclusion of the Observer in their 11 dimensional analyzes of the Material Universe, the M-brane models none the less represented a gigantic leap in the direction of the QF-models particle and reality descriptions. The QF-Theory of Everything--with five fewer dimension than the M-theory--prided it self of its insights into the foundations of Life itself and the holographic construction of the Human Brain and Consciousness that claimed to explain all its malfunctions.
The QF-theories brain models even went so far as to claim the explanations for the mathematical organization of the human brain and the reasons why the string theory physicists tryed to circumvent the mathematically irresolvable unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity. This they did by the creation of new artificial dimensions every time the differential equations became incalculable in their dealings with gravity. The QF-theory suggests that it's 6th and 5th dimensions incorporate the string theories artificially created mathematical dimensions; one in its 5th and five in the 6th.
This would not just agree with the suggestion of Witten that the five leading 10 dimensional string theories had been like mirrors of the one 11 dimensional string-membrane theory (M-theory), but further, that the extra dimensions used by this theory were excursions into the “mathematical mirror field” of the human brain. This was a brain faculty whose existence had been accidentally discovered in 2003 in the brains of rhesus monkeys, by two Italian brain scientists in Parma, Italy. Dr. Giocomo Rizzolati and Dr. Laila Craighero had published their findings in the Annual Review of Neuroscience in 2004, of what they called the MIRROR NEURONS, which later were shown to be in the same arrangement in the human brain. These “mirror neuron centers” had already been theoretically discovered by the QF-theory as early as 1985 and published in the first edition of THE LITTLE SCROLL in 2002.
Well. This is our, very brief, review of the situation in physics at the end of the 20th century and the onset of the 21st. Next is Part I, Chapter 5, which will deal with the methods which the QF-theory employs in its approach to the enigma of creation and everything. Methods by which the dilemmas facing physics are resolved in utter simplicity. This will be…
The Alternate Mathematical Approach.
Part One,
Chapter
Five
The
Alternate
Mathematical
Approach
Foundations
and
Justifications
for the Set
Mathematical
Approach
"The deeper we penetrate and the more extensive and embracing our theories become, the less empirical knowledge is needed to determine those theories."
Albert Einstein
Roger Penrose
Shortcomings of Mathematics in Physics.
a) The first of the shortcomings of mathematics appeared in QED when the physicist began to be capable of measuring the electron while it was making its energy interaction by the exchange and receipt of photons. Mathematical calculations indicated that while the electron was at it, it acquired a status of infinite energy. After a hard struggle the mathematicians/physicists found a mathematical way around this by what is know as renormalization. This appeared again in QCD with the nucleons and its strong interaction force carrier, the pions. Again, this problem was dealt with by the use of renormalization procedures or “the sweeping under the rug” as the father of QED, Paul Dirac, described it. His suggestion was that proper theoretical explanations were missing.
b) The second is the fact that proper mathematics does not exist in and beyond the GUT-era in the Big Bang event. The Planck Constant brakes down at Second 10-43 or at the mass/energy barrier (gravity) of 1032 K. At this point, the mathematical approach looses its capacity to describe space and time, or anything else for that matter. In addition to this problem, the supersymmetry, superstring group theory equations describing the Big Bang in the 10 dimensional accommodation, require what is described as mathematical compactification procedures, this in order to make the extra dimensions disappear. As before, the proper theoretical explanations are missing.
c) The third is the fact that high-precision mathematical modeling analyze–executed primarily by way of differential equations–are in practice applicable only to relatively simple and well-structured problems. In practice the laws of physics mean differential equations. From present configuration of a physical system, algorithms would determine their future sate. Here another shortcoming appears, but this is in the fact that we find computability limits when we come to deal with algorithms in twice-differentiable functions. Here is of particular interest the fact that a sort of non-computable physics problem has recently emerged in the investigation of quantum gravity. This has given the rise to the suggestions that the deep mysteries of any ultimate theory of the Universe may well have at its heart structures that are non-computable.
d) The fourth reason is the practically none existent mathematical ability of the brains positive causative hemisphere, normally the right (spatial) hemisphere, but this is the part of the brain that deals with space. This brain’s hemisphere has to be involved if the events of the GUT-era of the Big Bang are to be described according to reality as it is dictated by Nature, not by Man. This is the part of the brain that commonly involves the functions that are described as sub- or unconscious.
Discovery and Kurt Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem.
MAN CANNOT LOOK FOR THE ULTIMATE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE UNIVERSE BY LOOKING WITH ONLY ONE BRAIN HEMISPHERES REALITY. MAN WILL NOT ACHIEVE A CORRECT PICTURE. IN ORDER TO “SEE THE ULTIMATE TRUTH”, MAN MUST “LOOK” WITH BOTH HEMISPHERIC REALITIES (HOLISTIC).
 |
Professor Kurt Gödel had been born in Brno, (now the Check repu- blic) in 1906 and educated in Vien- na. During the Nazi terror he moved to Princeton, where he worked with Einstein for a number of years. As a young man he had become famous as a magnificent pure mathema- tician gaining his Ph.D. in 1930 at the University of Vienna, where he, 1926 to 1931 metaphorically speak- ing, had ‘asked the discipline of mathematics, whether it could be used to prove everything’. Much to the consternation of the world of mathematicians, the never erring art of mathematics, thorough this theo- rem told him that mathematics could not tell him all the truths. |
The apparent reason for this–and this again is a metaphor–was that; all by it self, mathematics did not represent the whole truth. It suggested that some answers would have to come from another system outside of mathematics. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem shook the very foundations of mathematics supported logic, this even to the extend that it even cast doubt on the validity of the presumed empirical work of A. N. Whitehead and B. Russell, PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA, published 1910-1913.
| The transcendence experience that originated the QF-theory and the eventual results of the author’s research, are the foundation of his conviction that the solution to the riddle of Gödel’s theorem is found in Dr. Roger Sperry’s 1981 Nobel Prize findings. This progressed via the author’s question what system the spatial hemisphere of the brain would require in order to look in unison with the mathematics hemi- sphere, at the quantum nature results from the particle accelerators. The answer came to him via the transcen- dental spiritual experience in Decem- ber 1984. This in the form of ‘visual mathematics symbolic logic’, of the Venn diagram set-mathematics. |  |
In retrospect, it would all seem so simple. The spatial hemisphere worked and communicated through symbols, so it would have to be a form of symbolic logic that applied to the spatial hemisphere. However, the author does not believe that he would, or could have come to this answer without the spiritual experience.
Methods of Approach to the Enigmas of Physics.
For a close look at the integration questions of brain research, psychobiology and physics Theories of Everything, here is a review of the highlights of the progression of the scientific endeavours to understand the brain in the last two centuries, where we begin with the Greek philosopher Pythagoras (6th century BC) who suggested that the brain was the organ of the mind. About 20 centuries later Leonardo da Vinci made the first wax cast of a brain and a few decades later Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564) of Brussels produced the first “modern” anatomy of the brain, based on detailed drawings of corpses. In England William Harvey (1578-1657) discoverer of the circulation of the blood suggested that sensory nerves took sensations to the brain, and motor nerves worked muscles. In 1637 René Descartes (1596-1650), the French founder of modern philosophy, divorced the soul from the brain, underpinning a belief that mind is not a mere product of the brain. A century later the Italian anatomist Luigi Galvani (1737-1798) showed that an electrical charge made muscles contract and the German physician Franz Joseph Gall (1758-1828) dissected the brain, laying a basis for modern neurology. Scottish surgeon Sir Charles Bell (1774-1842) in 1811 showed that each nerve carries motor or sensory stimuli, not both. In 1861 the French surgeon Paul Broca (1824-1880) established that articulate speech depended on a site in the left cerebral hemisphere and the German biochemist Johan Ludwig Wilhelm Thudichum (1829-1901) pioneered the study of brain chemistry about 1870 and four years later another German, neurologist Carl Wernicke (1848-1905) discovered the brain area concerned with understanding words. Scottish researcher Sir David Ferrier (1843-1928) mapped the motor cortex and found the sensory strip and the British anthropometrist Sir Francis Galton (1822-1911) pioneered the scientific study of the nature of intelligence in 1892.
At the end of the 19th century and in the first decades of the 20th, at about the time of the birth of the New Physics, James, Freud and Jung, the pioneer psychologists appeared. The American psychology theorist William James (1849-1910) may be said to have pioneered the study of psychic phenomena at a similar time as the strangest figure in all of man’s scientific endeavors appeared. This was the well meaning Austrian, active drug addict and alcoholic, the physician Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), who pioneered the useless practice of psychoanalysis in the 1890s. Freud, who was on cocaine for 13 to 15 years (1890 to 1905) got scared when his friend went insane and died from cocaine addiction. He then stopped using it and turned to champagne, cognac and white wine until 1923, when he got cancer and turned to morphine. It is during the years that the morphine was Freud’s God that he wrote his THE FUTURE OF AN ILLUSION. For the purpose of considering the possibility of connecting the sciences of physics and the study of Man, it is of vital importance that the truth about the erroneous but influential teachings of Freud be known.
The fact that for the most part of the 20th century, an active alcoholic and drug addict was considered to have written the foundations for the analyses of Man’s psychology and its corrective goals, is possibly the weirdest event in the history of all our sciences. This is also a testimony to the state of our ignorance regarding our true nature, the functions of the human brain, and the ailments that besiege it. Notwithstanding the fact that the studies and theoretical writings of Freud and his description of what he considered to be “normal underlying human behavior motives” are worthless and dangerous as such, they have some use as descriptions of unnatural human addiction mentalities. The greatest damage, however, that Freud’s alcoholic super-ego produced was his vilification and slander of his contemporary, the Swiss psychiatrist, Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961), the founder of the analytical school of psychology, who unmasked the unparalleled scientific falsification of Freud. Through this the Feudists hampered the advancement of Jungian psychology, which is now proving itself as the closest analyses to the natural psyche of Man, but this is verified by the QF-brain models.
Around the turn of the 19th century the Spanish histologist Santiago Ramón y Cajal (1852-1934) proved that the nervous system consists of a maze of individual cells and redeveloped a staining technique still in use today. In the early 1900s, the Russian physiologist Ivan Petrovitch Pavlov (1849-1936) discovered conditioned reflexes in dogs and the British researcher Thomas Renton Elliott (1877-1961) showed in 1904 that nerve impulses could be chemically transmitted while the French psychologist Alfred Binet (1857-1911) devised tests (1905—11) that made him the “father of modern intelligence testing.” The Canadian neurosurgeon Wilder Graves Penfield would then in and after the late 1920s used microelectrodes to map parts of the human cerebral cortex with differing functions and the German psychiatrist Hans Berger recorded the first human encephalogram in 1929. The American psychologist Burrhus F. Skinner (1904-1990) in 1930 described operant conditioning while the British physiologist Sir Charles Scott Sherrington (1857-1952) made major discoveries of inborn reflexes and showed the central nervous system involves integration of different “levels” and in the US, Giuseppe Moruzzi and Horace Magoun, showed in 1949 that brainstem signals keep the whole brain awake, while in 1953 the American researcher James Olds (1922-1976) discovered a pleasure center in the brain and British researchers including Geoffrey Harris in 1965 showed sexuality to be built into the hypothalamus. Then in 1960 C. H. Li initiated the most important discoveries into the endorphin molecule neurotransmitters, which culminated in the Nobel Prize work in the mid 1970s by the Scottish brain chemists John Hughes and Hans Kosterlitz. The Austro-American neuro-physiologist Karl Pribram then suggested brain activity resembled holography, a photographic-like process and the American psycho biologist Roger Sperry made his all-important Nobel Prize “split-brain discoveries”.
Soon after the Second World War, neurological, neuro-chemical and brain research was greatly accelerated and expanded as ever more sophisticated theoretical models of the brain and its functions were formulated. The last two decades then produced highly sophisticated electronic and chemistry technologies giving rise to new approach to psychology in the form of psychobiology. From these advances came such Nobel Prize discoveries as the composition, structure and fundamental workings of the DNA molecule, the double helix of life, initiated in 1953 by Franklin, Watson, Wilkins and Crick, which at the turn of the century culminated in the complete counting of the human DNA's nucleotides and the counting and mapping of its genes.
These insights then set the stage for the author's interpretation of his creation process vision that includes life and the Observer's brain and consciousness and the ensuing creation of the QF-brain models.
The Questions of Hawking and Medawar.
In the same book are also found comments on the nature of discoveries made by the late professor of theoretical physics, Dr. David Bohm (See quotation at the entry to Chapter Two). Dr. Bohm suggested that the physicists could free their minds–at least briefly–from their self-created mental prison, in order to attain an instant of scientific insight and creation. This line of realization is also reflected in the thinking of Dr. Steven Weinberg in his article on the Unification of Physics in the End of the Millennium Special Issue of the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN. There he says: “A unified theory of all forces will probably require radically new ideas.”
All this suggests that the discoverer must know before hand not only which way to step, but also, how to step and additionally the he must have the courage to take that step. If the scientists knew which way and how to step, there would of course be no problems with making insights and discoveries. Since the methods used in the discovery and creation of the QF-theory that unfolds in this book, have primarily come into being through the active practice of meditation techniques, it is proper that the author should try to explain the principles behind his approach. Of these, two are given to us by physics:
Second: The principles of beauty and simplicity.
Next it would be proper to explain the logic behind the choice for the Meditating Observer, but the reasons were discussed here prior. There are further two reasons given to the author by Medawar and Hawking:
First: The
inability of Man to decide his discoveries through his ego-will.
Second: Man’s
inability to know which way to step to make a discovery.
As the author would later learn, then the qualities required in such an Observer as here is being described are not just achieved through plain meditational techniques. The way to step is not just depended on meditation, but on the success in reaching the highest goals of such techniques. This involves the definition of the Observer listed in this book as the Transcended Observer, and it is believed here that this can only be achieved through what the author describe as a: Spatial-hemispheric Quantum Re-synchronization Biofeedback, know in yoga meditational techniques as: “A Healthy Kundalini Awakening”, or in the terms of modern psychology-psychiatry "Quantum Change". This in turn is something that science does not generally know of, consider, or understand, since this is something, which Man does not commonly have any control over. In this the professions of psychology and psychiatry in the Western cultures are generally incapable of differentiating between a healthy and a malfunctioning arousal of this energy in the body. This is due to the fact that in the West, the malfunctioning arousal of this energy is the rule, the healthy one being the exception. A further problem is the fact that it has so far, proven impossible to scientifically investigate this phenomena, or the kind of energy involved. A healthy bio-feed involving the Kundalini or Quantum Change energy–as is being referred to here–results in a healthy spatial/none- speech hemispheric domination. This is where the neo-cortex is absent of a sub-conscious- unconscious, and is free from interfering instinct impulses from the brain’s limbic system, as well as an accumulation of copies of negative-quanta, from the material/ego hemisphere in the implicate-intron side of the genetic structure (QF introns include non-coding intergenetic DNA) in the spatial hemisphere. Through this, the implicate-intron side in the spatial hemisphere becomes dominant in the thought processes that are taking place. These processes are not commonly known phenomena today, but they will be explained in Part Three, where their understanding is made accessible through the QF-theory. It should further be emphasized that these thought processes were not, and cannot, be achieved with the use of any form of molecular structures that replace the brain’s natural neurotransmitters. Only those produced naturally by the brains thought processes and the resulting endocrine system functions, through the RNA copying the DNA.
The reader should be informed–and it emphasized here–that the thought processes employed in the birth of the ideas involved in this theorization were not introduced for the purpose of gaining insights into the events of the Big Bang. Neither were they intended for the purpose of gaining insights into the GUT-era, nor the theorizations involved in a Complete Unified Theory, or Theory of Everything. The thought processes were employed for the purpose of gaining insights into the natural and unnatural functions of the human brain. The birth of the ideas for the QF-theory, are unexpected by-products of these endeavors. The fact that the Observer involved in the QF-theorizations was not seeking these insights may possibly have been most conductive to their discovery since without him being aware of it, these constitute the same truths discussed in Chapter One under the 10 maxims.
The Way for the Observer to Proceed.
This is truly “The Road less Traveled.”